Hardening Sprint
You do not have to be the one who fixes it.
from €1,500 + VAT. The audit hands you a list you can work through yourself. If your week has no room in it, this is the version where I do the work instead, against a scope we settle in writing first.
It is bounded on purpose. A fixed list, a fixed price, and an ending you can see from the start.
From €1,845 including VAT. EU businesses with a valid VAT number pay €1,500 — reverse charge.
What is delivered
Five things, then I am gone.
A sprint ends, which is most of why it is worth buying, and why the list below is short enough to hold in your head.
The named fixes, implemented
Only the ones written into the scope before anything is touched. A finding that is not on that list does not get quietly worked on.
Tests for what changed
So the fix is demonstrable rather than asserted, and so the next change has something to break against.
The documentation brought up to date
Whatever the change made untrue in your own notes gets corrected while the context is still fresh.
A retest
The same read that produced the finding, run again over the corrected code, confirming the finding is gone.
A handoff
What changed, why, and what you now own. You should be able to keep going without me.
Not in scope
What a sprint will not turn into.
Every one of these is how a bounded engagement turns into an open one. Naming them is what keeps the price fixed.
- Unrelated features.
- Unlimited refactor.
- Round-the-clock availability.
- Broad product redesign.
- Certification of any kind.
A sprint also inherits the ceiling of whatever diagnosed the problem. An audit is a read: it runs nothing, and it says so. Clearing every finding it produced tells you those findings are gone, not that the app holds under real use, and the person who wrote the fix is the wrong person to rule on that anyway. That judgement comes from the Review, which traces and tests the flows a read can only look at.
Before it starts
Four things have to exist first.
Each one is something that, when it is missing, turns a fixed price into an argument later.
A diagnosis
An audit at €350 does it, and so does an equivalent piece of work someone else produced. What matters is that the problems are already named and evidenced.
A scope both of us agreed
Which findings, in what order. Written down, priced against that list, and not moved without a conversation.
Someone who owns the decision
One person who can say yes to a change. Two people with different opinions on the same file is a project, not a sprint.
An agreement on what counts as done
Stated before the work, so finishing is a fact rather than a negotiation.
Start here
Tell me what the report said.
If you already have an audit, send me the findings you want gone and I will price that list. If you do not, the audit is the cheaper way to find out what the list even is.